WILSON v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 14-2498. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140930854
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. AND NOW , this 24 th day of September , 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6), Plaintiff Bella Wilson's Response (Docket No. 9), and Defendant's Reply Brief (Docket No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claims brought in her individual capacity are DISMISSED ; 2. Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED ; an
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. AND NOW , this 24 th day of September , 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6), Plaintiff Bella Wilson's Response (Docket No. 9), and Defendant's Reply Brief (Docket No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claims brought in her individual capacity are DISMISSED ; 2. Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED ; and..
More
ORDER
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.
AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6), Plaintiff Bella Wilson's Response (Docket No. 9), and Defendant's Reply Brief (Docket No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Plaintiff's claims brought in her individual capacity are DISMISSED;
2. Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED; and
3. The remainder of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
