LAFATE v. VANGUARD GROUP, INC., 13-cv-5555. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141009g95
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER LYNNE A. SITARSKI, Magistrate Judge. AND NOW , this 7th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery or in the Alternative Production of a Privilege Log (ECF No. 59), and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 67), and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED .
ORDER
LYNNE A. SITARSKI, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Vanguard's Response to Discovery or in the Alternative Production of a Privilege Log (ECF No. 59), and Defendant's opposition thereto (ECF No. 67), and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
