MORINA v. NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC., 14-1394. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141014749
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant The Neiman March Group LLC 1 ("Defendant")'s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 10), Plaintiff Alberto Morina ("Plaintiff")'s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 13), Defendant's Reply Brief (Docket No. 14), and Plaintiff's Sur-Reply Brief (Docket No. 15), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration is GRANTED;
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant The Neiman March Group LLC 1 ("Defendant")'s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 10), Plaintiff Alberto Morina ("Plaintiff")'s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 13), Defendant's Reply Brief (Docket No. 14), and Plaintiff's Sur-Reply Brief (Docket No. 15), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration is GRANTED; ..
More
ORDER
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant The Neiman March Group LLC1 ("Defendant")'s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 10), Plaintiff Alberto Morina ("Plaintiff")'s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 13), Defendant's Reply Brief (Docket No. 14), and Plaintiff's Sur-Reply Brief (Docket No. 15), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration is GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. This case is closed.
It is so ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff incorrectly captioned Defendant in his Complaint as "Neiman Marcus Group, Inc."
Source: Leagle
