PISKANIN v. CAMERON, 11-cv-4698. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141020855
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 16 day of October, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarsi and objections there to IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 16 day of October, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarsi and objections there to IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED ..
More
ORDER
BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 16 day of October, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarsi and objections there to IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED without an evidentiary hearing.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
