KOPKO v. LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, 14-1290. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141028868
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge. AND NOW, this 21 st day of October 2014, upon consideration of defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 12), plaintiff's response in opposition (doc. no. 14), and defendants' reply thereto (doc. no. 21) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 12) is GRANTED; 2. Counts III and IV are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Plaintiff may not seek relief in Count I for events occurring before January 10, 2009; 4. Plaintiff may not
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge. AND NOW, this 21 st day of October 2014, upon consideration of defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 12), plaintiff's response in opposition (doc. no. 14), and defendants' reply thereto (doc. no. 21) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 12) is GRANTED; 2. Counts III and IV are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Plaintiff may not seek relief in Count I for events occurring before January 10, 2009; 4. Plaintiff may not s..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of October 2014, upon consideration of defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 12), plaintiff's response in opposition (doc. no. 14), and defendants' reply thereto (doc. no. 21) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 12) is GRANTED;
2. Counts III and IV are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
3. Plaintiff may not seek relief in Count I for events occurring before January 10, 2009;
4. Plaintiff may not seek relief in Count II for events occurring before May 10, 2009; and
5. Plaintiff may not pursue an ADEA Retaliation claim under Count I.
Source: Leagle
