WELBORNE v. TRITT, 14-1457 (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141028p89
Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge. AND NOW, this 27 th day of October 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of Magistrate Judge Caracappa's report and recommendation (doc. no. 13), to which no timely objection has been made, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The report and recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 1 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; 3. There is no probable cause to issue
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge. AND NOW, this 27 th day of October 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of Magistrate Judge Caracappa's report and recommendation (doc. no. 13), to which no timely objection has been made, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The report and recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 1 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; 3. There is no probable cause to issue a..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of October 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of Magistrate Judge Caracappa's report and recommendation (doc. no. 13), to which no timely objection has been made, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The report and recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;1
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED;
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability;
4. The clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
FootNotes
1. Since the Mr. Welborne has not filed objections, I need only give some reasoned consideration of the report and recommendation. Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987). I have reviewed Judge Caracappa's report and recommendation and find it to be well reasoned and free of clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note.
Source: Leagle
