BAKER v. WENEROWICZ, 13-6329. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141205b48
Visitors: 27
Filed: Dec. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 4 th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff's petition for writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket #1), the defendant's response and plaintiff's reply, thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiar
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 4 th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff's petition for writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket #1), the defendant's response and plaintiff's reply, thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary..
More
ORDER
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff's petition for writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket #1), the defendant's response and plaintiff's reply, thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and,
3. There is no basis for issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
