SPEAR v. FENKELL, 13-02391. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141208a60
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LLORET, Magistrate Judge. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, it is on this 5th day of December, 2014 ORDERED that David Fenkell's and Karen Fenkell's motion to quash subpoenas, Doc. No. 176, is denied. The entities subpoenaed shall produce the documents subpoenaed. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all entities subpoenaed. Plaintiffs' counsel shall redact the first five digits of any Social Security number conta
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LLORET, Magistrate Judge. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, it is on this 5th day of December, 2014 ORDERED that David Fenkell's and Karen Fenkell's motion to quash subpoenas, Doc. No. 176, is denied. The entities subpoenaed shall produce the documents subpoenaed. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all entities subpoenaed. Plaintiffs' counsel shall redact the first five digits of any Social Security number contai..
More
ORDER
RICHARD A. LLORET, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, it is on this 5th day of December, 2014
ORDERED
that David Fenkell's and Karen Fenkell's motion to quash subpoenas, Doc. No. 176, is denied. The entities subpoenaed shall produce the documents subpoenaed. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all entities subpoenaed. Plaintiffs' counsel shall redact the first five digits of any Social Security number contained in the documents before they are disclosed or used in any fashion in this litigation or elsewhere. No subpoenaed document containing an unredacted Social Security number shall be disclosed to any other party or person.
Source: Leagle
