U.S. v. RODRIGUEZ, 08-729-02. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141216e31
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER PAUL S. DIAMOND, District Judge. AND NOW , this 10th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Pro Se Motion for Modification of his Sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (Doc. No. 175) ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED without prejudice because it does not "state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order." Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1)(B). It appears that this filing was an attempt to reach the Federal Community Defender Office, and Defendant is advised
Summary: ORDER PAUL S. DIAMOND, District Judge. AND NOW , this 10th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Pro Se Motion for Modification of his Sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (Doc. No. 175) ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED without prejudice because it does not "state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order." Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1)(B). It appears that this filing was an attempt to reach the Federal Community Defender Office, and Defendant is advised ..
More
ORDER
PAUL S. DIAMOND, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Pro Se Motion for Modification of his Sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (Doc. No. 175) ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED without prejudice because it does not "state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order." Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1)(B). It appears that this filing was an attempt to reach the Federal Community Defender Office, and Defendant is advised that that Office is located at 601 Walnut Street and not in the James A. Byrne United States Courthouse.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
