WALSH v. WALSH, 13-4550. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141216e33
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 12 th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff's petition for writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket #1) and the defendant's response, thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus DENIED; and, 3. There is no basis for the issuanc
Summary: ORDER MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. AND NOW, this 12 th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff's petition for writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket #1) and the defendant's response, thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus DENIED; and, 3. There is no basis for the issuance..
More
ORDER
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff's petition for writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket #1) and the defendant's response, thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus DENIED; and,
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
