PERRY v. VAUGHN, 02-839. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141231c17
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO, Judge. AND NOW, this 29, day of December 201_, upon careful and independent consideration of petitioner's Motion for Relief Under Fed. R. Civ. Pr. 60(b)(6), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The Rule 60(b)(6)Motion is DENIED. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
ORDER
NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, Judge.
AND NOW, this 29, day of December 201_, upon careful and independent consideration of petitioner's Motion for Relief Under Fed. R. Civ. Pr. 60(b)(6), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Rule 60(b)(6)Motion is DENIED.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
