Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge. AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5), Mr. Cannon's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 6), and after oral argument on December 5, 2014, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART so that: 1. The Motion is GRANTED as to Counts 1, 3, and 5 of the Complaint, purporting to state claims against the City and County of Ph
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge. AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5), Mr. Cannon's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 6), and after oral argument on December 5, 2014, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART so that: 1. The Motion is GRANTED as to Counts 1, 3, and 5 of the Complaint, purporting to state claims against the City and County of Phi..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5), Mr. Cannon's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 6), and after oral argument on December 5, 2014, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART so that:
1. The Motion is GRANTED as to Counts 1, 3, and 5 of the Complaint, purporting to state claims against the City and County of Philadelphia and Police Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey. All claims against Defendants the City and County of Philadelphia and Police Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey, including Counts 1, 3, and 5 of the Complaint, are DISMISSED; and
2. The Motion is DENIED as to Count 13 of the Complaint.
