PINDER v. ORTIZ, 14-cv-2989. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150128b60
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2015
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge. This 23rd day of January, 2015, after reviewing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, as well as all accompanying submissions by all parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The retaliation claims against Betsaida Ortiz and Paul Kihn contained within Count II of the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. The discrimination claims against Betsaida Ortiz and Paul Kihn contained within Count II o
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge. This 23rd day of January, 2015, after reviewing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, as well as all accompanying submissions by all parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The retaliation claims against Betsaida Ortiz and Paul Kihn contained within Count II of the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. The discrimination claims against Betsaida Ortiz and Paul Kihn contained within Count II of..
More
ORDER
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge.
This 23rd day of January, 2015, after reviewing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, as well as all accompanying submissions by all parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
The retaliation claims against Betsaida Ortiz and Paul Kihn contained within Count II of the First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. The discrimination claims against Betsaida Ortiz and Paul Kihn contained within Count II of the First Amended Complaint will remain.
Source: Leagle
