Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NIEVES v. ANZABI, 14-4861. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150129h66 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2015
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge. AND NOW, this 23rd day of January 2015, upon consideration of the motion of Defendants Esperanza Health Center, Inc., Bryan Hollinger, M.D., Timothy D. Johnston, M.D., Timothy J. Leahman, M.D., and Robert Reich to substitute the United States and then dismiss all claims against the United States and United States Defendant employees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [Doc. No. 2] and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompan
More

ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January 2015, upon consideration of the motion of Defendants Esperanza Health Center, Inc., Bryan Hollinger, M.D., Timothy D. Johnston, M.D., Timothy J. Leahman, M.D., and Robert Reich to substitute the United States and then dismiss all claims against the United States and United States Defendant employees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction [Doc. No. 2] and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that:

1) The United States is SUBSTITUTED as Defendant for all claims against Defendants Esperanza Health Center, Inc., Bryan Hollinger, M.D., Timothy D. Johnston, M.D., Timothy J. Leahman, M.D., and Robert Reich and these Defendants are DISMISSED from the case; 2) All claims in which the United States is substituted as Defendant are DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to file a new action once the administrative claims process is exhausted; 3) The claims against the remaining Defendants, Neshaminy Pharmacy and Ilhama Anzabi, are REMANDED to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, case no. 01674, April Term 2014, because dismissal of the claims against the United States leaves the Court without subject-matter jurisdiction; and 4) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer