NOEL v. ONEWEST BANK, 14-2899. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150317d93
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2015, upon consideration of Appellants' Brief (Doc. No. 5), Appellee's Response (Doc. No. 6), and Appellants' Reply (Doc. No. 7), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court's Order of March 12, 2014 dismissing the Noels' Adversary Case with Prejudice is AFFIRMED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the proprie
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2015, upon consideration of Appellants' Brief (Doc. No. 5), Appellee's Response (Doc. No. 6), and Appellants' Reply (Doc. No. 7), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court's Order of March 12, 2014 dismissing the Noels' Adversary Case with Prejudice is AFFIRMED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the propriet..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2015, upon consideration of Appellants' Brief (Doc. No. 5), Appellee's Response (Doc. No. 6), and Appellants' Reply (Doc. No. 7), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court's Order of March 12, 2014 dismissing the Noels' Adversary Case with Prejudice is AFFIRMED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the propriety of the sanctions award found in the Bankruptcy Court's Order, and for this reason, the appeal of the sanctions award is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle
