MEAD v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, INC., 14-2695. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150320920
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Inc. for summary judgment (Doc. # 41) is GRANTED as to Count III and Count IV of the amended complaint and insofar as plaintiffs seek punitive damages and an award of attorneys' fees; (2) the motion of defendant for summary judgment is otherwise DENIED;
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Inc. for summary judgment (Doc. # 41) is GRANTED as to Count III and Count IV of the amended complaint and insofar as plaintiffs seek punitive damages and an award of attorneys' fees; (2) the motion of defendant for summary judgment is otherwise DENIED; ..
More
ORDER
HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge
AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) the motion of defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Inc. for summary judgment (Doc. # 41) is GRANTED as to Count III and Count IV of the amended complaint and insofar as plaintiffs seek punitive damages and an award of attorneys' fees;
(2) the motion of defendant for summary judgment is otherwise DENIED;
(3) the cross-motion of plaintiffs Andrea Mead and William Danowski for summary judgment (Doc. # 42) is DENIED; and
(4) the motion of defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Inc. to strike as untimely the cross-motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment (Doc. # 43) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
