SUGARTOWN WORLDWIDE LLC v. SHANKS, Civil Action. N0.14-5063. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150326777
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, on this 24 th day of March 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Glover's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and/or Failure to State a Claim (ECF Doc. No. 11), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13) and Defendant Glover's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 19), and as detailed in the accompanying Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant Glover's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is GRANTED as to Count II (fra
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, on this 24 th day of March 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Glover's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and/or Failure to State a Claim (ECF Doc. No. 11), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13) and Defendant Glover's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 19), and as detailed in the accompanying Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant Glover's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is GRANTED as to Count II (frau..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, on this 24th day of March 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Glover's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and/or Failure to State a Claim (ECF Doc. No. 11), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13) and Defendant Glover's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 19), and as detailed in the accompanying Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. Defendant Glover's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is GRANTED as to Count II (fraud in the inducement/civil conspiracy) and Count III (unjust enrichment); Counts II and III are DISMISSED with prejudice against Defendant Glover for lack of personal jurisdiction;
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part:
a. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Count I (piercing the corporate veil) and as to any claim in Count IV for a constructive trust, receiver or accounting from non-parties (Fed. R. Civ. P. 19) and these claims are DISMISSED without prejudice as described in the accompanying Memorandum.
b. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count IV (Fraudulent Transfer Act) and Count V (Breach of Fiduciary Duty) is DENIED.
3. Defendant Glover shall answer Counts IV and V of the Complaint on or before April 6, 2015.
Source: Leagle
