FABER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, 15-00191. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150414b36
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW , this 13th day of April, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 11), and all memoranda submitted in opposition to and support of that Motion (Doc. Nos. 12, 13, 14), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Motion is GRANTED ; 2. Count I of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED to the extent it is based on checks negotiated before May 12, 2011; 3. Count II of the Amended Complaint
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW , this 13th day of April, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 11), and all memoranda submitted in opposition to and support of that Motion (Doc. Nos. 12, 13, 14), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Motion is GRANTED ; 2. Count I of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED to the extent it is based on checks negotiated before May 12, 2011; 3. Count II of the Amended Complaint i..
More
ORDER
GERALD J. PAPPERT, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 11), and all memoranda submitted in opposition to and support of that Motion (Doc. Nos. 12, 13, 14), it is ORDERED that:
1. The Motion is GRANTED;
2. Count I of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED to the extent it is based on checks negotiated before May 12, 2011;
3. Count II of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED;
4. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint on or before May 4, 2015.
Source: Leagle
