Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KENNEDY v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, 13-2678. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150427a08 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 24 th day of April 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), [ECF 104, 105, 108, 109, 113, 114], no response in opposition thereto, and consistent with the Memorandum Opinion filed on this day, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED. Plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED as to all Defendants. The Clerk of Court is
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 24th day of April 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), [ECF 104, 105, 108, 109, 113, 114], no response in opposition thereto, and consistent with the Memorandum Opinion filed on this day, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED. Plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED as to all Defendants.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer