Filed: May 04, 2015
Latest Update: May 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER STEWART DALZELL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of plaintiffs' amended complaint (docket entry #9), defendant Gilead Sciences, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (docket entry #16), plaintiffs' response in opposition thereto, defendant's reply, plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a sur-reply (docket entry #20), defendant's opposition thereto, and Ronald A. Williams's pro se motion to intervene (docket entry #22), and for
Summary: ORDER STEWART DALZELL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of plaintiffs' amended complaint (docket entry #9), defendant Gilead Sciences, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (docket entry #16), plaintiffs' response in opposition thereto, defendant's reply, plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a sur-reply (docket entry #20), defendant's opposition thereto, and Ronald A. Williams's pro se motion to intervene (docket entry #22), and for t..
More
ORDER
STEWART DALZELL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of plaintiffs' amended complaint (docket entry #9), defendant Gilead Sciences, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (docket entry #16), plaintiffs' response in opposition thereto, defendant's reply, plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a sur-reply (docket entry #20), defendant's opposition thereto, and Ronald A. Williams's pro se motion to intervene (docket entry #22), and for the reasons set forth in our Memorandum issued this day on this case, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs' motion to file a sur-reply (docket entry #20) is GRANTED;
2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (docket entry #16) is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiffs' amended complaint (docket entry #9) is DISMISSED;
4. Ronald A. Williams's pro se motion to intervene (docket entry #22) is DENIED AS MOOT; and
5. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically.
