JALEN Z v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, 13-4654. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150519b58
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 15, 2015
Latest Update: May 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2015, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiffs' Motions for Judgment on the Supplemented Administrative Record (ECF Nos. 29, 38) are GRANTED as to the Pennsylvania Special Education Hearing Officer's ruling on interim pendency and DENIED as to the Hearing Officer's ruling on the adequacy of the individualized education program ("IEP");
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2015, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiffs' Motions for Judgment on the Supplemented Administrative Record (ECF Nos. 29, 38) are GRANTED as to the Pennsylvania Special Education Hearing Officer's ruling on interim pendency and DENIED as to the Hearing Officer's ruling on the adequacy of the individualized education program ("IEP"); ..
More
ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2015, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1) Plaintiffs' Motions for Judgment on the Supplemented Administrative Record (ECF Nos. 29, 38) are GRANTED as to the Pennsylvania Special Education Hearing Officer's ruling on interim pendency and DENIED as to the Hearing Officer's ruling on the adequacy of the individualized education program ("IEP");
(2) Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (ECF No. 31) is GRANTED as to the Hearing Officer's ruling on the adequacy of the IEP and DENIED as to the Hearing Officer's ruling on interim pendency; and
(3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
(4) The Court will separately schedule an evidentiary hearing to determine the amount of reimbursement to which Plaintiffs are entitled on their pendency claim.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
