Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ARNDT v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 14-5586. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150521d35 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 20, 2015
Latest Update: May 20, 2015
Summary: Order GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 20th day of May, 2015, for the reasons stated in my accompanying memorandum opinion, the respective Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Wells Fargo and MCS are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: 1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiff's Complaint (Invasion of Privacy — Intrusion Upon Seclusion) are GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint (Intentio
More

Order

This 20th day of May, 2015, for the reasons stated in my accompanying memorandum opinion, the respective Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Wells Fargo and MCS are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:

1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiff's Complaint (Invasion of Privacy — Intrusion Upon Seclusion) are GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) are GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Count VI of Plaintiff's Complaint (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress) are GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 4. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's request for punitive damages are DENIED without prejudice to Defendants to reassert their arguments at summary judgment. 5. Plaintiff may amend her Complaint without leave of Court within 21 days of the entry of this Order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer