HOFFMAN v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 13-cv-5700. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150617d85
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 16th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Reconsideration, as well as all accompanying submissions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: • The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The remaining UTPCPL claim against Wells Fargo is dismissed. • The Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The UTPCPL claim against Phelan Hallinan and Courtenay Dunn is dismissed. The FDCPA
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 16th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Reconsideration, as well as all accompanying submissions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: • The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The remaining UTPCPL claim against Wells Fargo is dismissed. • The Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The UTPCPL claim against Phelan Hallinan and Courtenay Dunn is dismissed. The FDCPA c..
More
ORDER
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge.
This 16th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Reconsideration, as well as all accompanying submissions, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
• The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The remaining UTPCPL claim against Wells Fargo is dismissed.
• The Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The UTPCPL claim against Phelan Hallinan and Courtenay Dunn is dismissed. The FDCPA claim against both Defendants will remain.
Source: Leagle
