Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARDNER-LOZADA v. SEPTA, 13-2755. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150727948 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (Docket No. 67), Plaintiff's Motion for Relief and to Make Whole (Docket No. 68), Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 69), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion (Docket No. 74), and Defendant's Reply Brief (Docket No. 80), and after oral argument on July 9, 2015, the Court hereby ORDERS and DECL
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (Docket No. 67), Plaintiff's Motion for Relief and to Make Whole (Docket No. 68), Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 69), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion (Docket No. 74), and Defendant's Reply Brief (Docket No. 80), and after oral argument on July 9, 2015, the Court hereby ORDERS and DECLARES that:

1. Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 69) is GRANTED so that judgment is entered for Defendant SEPTA on Counts I & III; 2. Plaintiff's Motions for Attorney Fees and Costs (Docket No. 67) and for Relief and to Make Whole (Docket No. 68) are DEEMED MOOT.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer