PALAGANO v. NVIDIA CORPORATION, 15-1248. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150826e64
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2015
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 19 th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of NVIDIA Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 24), Mr. Palagano's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 28), and NVIDIA Corporation's Reply (Docket No. 29) and Post-Argument Submission (Docket No. 34), and following oral argument on July 20, 2015, the Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. NVIDIA Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 24) is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of C
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 19 th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of NVIDIA Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 24), Mr. Palagano's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 28), and NVIDIA Corporation's Reply (Docket No. 29) and Post-Argument Submission (Docket No. 34), and following oral argument on July 20, 2015, the Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. NVIDIA Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 24) is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of Co..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of NVIDIA Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 24), Mr. Palagano's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 28), and NVIDIA Corporation's Reply (Docket No. 29) and Post-Argument Submission (Docket No. 34), and following oral argument on July 20, 2015, the Court hereby ORDERS that:
1. NVIDIA Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 24) is GRANTED;
2. The Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER THIS CASE to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; and
3. The Clerk of Court shall MARK THIS CASE CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.
Source: Leagle
