DIFIORE v. CSL BEHRING, U.S., LLC, 13-5027. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150914835
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 11th day of September, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topics 1 through 8, 10, and 11 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 12 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART , as set forth in the accompanying memorandum.
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 11th day of September, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topics 1 through 8, 10, and 11 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 12 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART , as set forth in the accompanying memorandum. 3..
More
ORDER
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge.
This 11th day of September, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topics 1 through 8, 10, and 11 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED.
2. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 12 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as set forth in the accompanying memorandum.
3. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 21 identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as set forth in the accompanying memorandum.
4. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topics 24 through 26 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED.
5. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topics 29 through 30 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED.
6. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 32 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED.
7. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 33 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is DENIED.
8. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 34 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED.
9. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 38 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED.
10. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order to Strike Topic 40 as identified in Plaintiff's Amended 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition is GRANTED.
11. Plaintiff is granted leave to file her response to Defendant's pending Motion for Summary Judgment after the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition(s).
Source: Leagle
