Filed: Sep. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24 — Granted Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23 — Denied JOSEPH F. LEESON, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17 th day of September, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT : 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23, is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED; 3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintif
Summary: ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24 — Granted Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23 — Denied JOSEPH F. LEESON, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17 th day of September, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT : 1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23, is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED; 3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff..
More
ORDER
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24 — Granted Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23 — Denied
JOSEPH F. LEESON, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23, is DENIED;
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED;
3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant: Plaintiff has no duty or obligation to defend or indemnify Tray-Pak against the allegations in the civil action: Norpaco, Inc. v. Tray-Pak Corporation, No. MMX CV13 6009442 S (Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Middlesex at Middletown).
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
