Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHARTOCK v. AMTRAK, 14-2327. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150923e08 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 21 st day of September, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Docket No. 15), the Response in Opposition by Plaintiffs Mitchell Chartock and Tikico, LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs") (Docket No. 16), and Defendant's Reply (Docket No. 19), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED for Defendant against all Plaintiffs, on
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Docket No. 15), the Response in Opposition by Plaintiffs Mitchell Chartock and Tikico, LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs") (Docket No. 16), and Defendant's Reply (Docket No. 19), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED for Defendant against all Plaintiffs, on the entirety of the Complaint. THIS CASE IS CLOSED.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer