DEVINE v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, 15-1361. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20151030c22
Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28 th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff's uncontested Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum (Doc. No. 20), it is hereby ORDERED that the Reply Memorandum attached to said Motion shall be deemed FILED as of this day. It is further Ordered as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED and judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Edward Devine and against
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28 th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff's uncontested Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum (Doc. No. 20), it is hereby ORDERED that the Reply Memorandum attached to said Motion shall be deemed FILED as of this day. It is further Ordered as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED and judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Edward Devine and against D..
More
ORDER
C. DARNELL JONES, II, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff's uncontested Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum (Doc. No. 20), it is hereby ORDERED that the Reply Memorandum attached to said Motion shall be deemed FILED as of this day.
It is further Ordered as follows:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED and judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Edward Devine and against Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC on Count I of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint;
2. For the reasons set forth in this Court's accompanying Memorandum, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Edward Devine and against Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC on Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; and,
3. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Production (Doc. No. 22) and Amended Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Production (Doc. No. 23) are DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
