SANTIAGO v. ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER, 15-2212. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20151106c49
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5 th day of November 2015, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of the Second Amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 23), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 27), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 28) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: 1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs FMLA interference
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5 th day of November 2015, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of the Second Amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 23), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 27), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 28) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: 1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs FMLA interference ..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of November 2015, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of the Second Amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 23), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 27), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 28) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs FMLA interference claim and Count III is dismissed with prejudice;
2. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to any FMLA retaliation claim relating to the 2014 termination and DENIED as to the other two FMLA retaliation claims plead in 1111137-138 of the Second Amended Complaint; and,
3. Defendant shall answer the Second Amended Complaint no later than November 16, 2015.
Source: Leagle
