ROBERTSON-ARMSTRONG v. ROBINSON HELICOPTER COMPANY, INC., 13-2810. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20151120e19
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendant Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. "to Preclude Plaintiff's Expert McSwain Engineering from Offering Any Opinions or Testimony at Trial" (Doc. # 91) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (2) the motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to preclude William Carden and Eric Van Iderstine from testif
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendant Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. "to Preclude Plaintiff's Expert McSwain Engineering from Offering Any Opinions or Testimony at Trial" (Doc. # 91) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (2) the motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to preclude William Carden and Eric Van Iderstine from testify..
More
ORDER
HARVEY BARTLE, III, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) the motion of defendant Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. "to Preclude Plaintiff's Expert McSwain Engineering from Offering Any Opinions or Testimony at Trial" (Doc. # 91) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
(2) the motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to preclude William Carden and Eric Van Iderstine from testifying about (a) regulatory compliance and (b) injury causation and biomechanics independent of the seat materials and restraints used in the subject helicopter; and
(3) the motion is otherwise DENIED.
Source: Leagle
