JOHNSON v. OYR REALTY PARTNERS LP, 14-CV-4630. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20151211b36
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 49) and the OYR Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and judgment as a matter of law is entered in favor of Moving Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. on all of the Plaintiffs' Claims against it as set f
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 49) and the OYR Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and judgment as a matter of law is entered in favor of Moving Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. on all of the Plaintiffs' Claims against it as set fo..
More
ORDER
J. CURTIS JOYNER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 49) and the OYR Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and judgment as a matter of law is entered in favor of Moving Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. on all of the Plaintiffs' Claims against it as set forth in the Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects, the Motion is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
