UNISTRIP TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. LIFESCAN, INC, 14-4518. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20151230994
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of December, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 47), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 54), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 56), Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 58), and Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 59), it is ORDERED in accordance with the O
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of December, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 47), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 54), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 56), Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 58), and Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 59), it is ORDERED in accordance with the Op..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 47), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 54), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 56), Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 58), and Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 59), it is ORDERED in accordance with the Opinion issued by the Court on this day that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART:
1. Count V of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 47) is DISMISSED.
2. Counts I, II, III, IV, and VI of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 47) will not be dismissed.
Source: Leagle