ORDER

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2016, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The Government's motion to permit the jury to use a redacted indictment during deliberations (ECF No. 251) will be TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT until the conclusion of the case;

2. Defendant's motion in limine to hold a hearing to determine admissibility of alleged co-conspirators' statements and establish the order of proof to prove a conspiracy (ECF No. 356) is DENIED;

3. Defendant's motion in limine to bar inflammatory language (ECF No. 357) is DENIED as premature;

4. Defendant's motion in limine for disclosure of forged or altered documents and a bill of particulars (ECF No. 358) is DENIED;

5. Defendant's motion in limine to specifically disclose Brady or Giglio material (ECF No. 359) is DENIED;

6. Defendant's motion to exclude peer comparison data and estimate evidence (ECF No. 361) is DENIED;

7. Defendant's motion in limine to strike the indictment as time-barred or in the alternative to amend the indictment to conform to the statute of limitations and bar evidence outside the statute of limitations (ECF No. 367) is DENIED; and

8. The Court will hold a hearing on the following pretrial motions at the conclusion of jury selection in this case:

a. The Government's motion in limine to admit tape recordings and transcripts (ECF No. 306), as amended (ECF No. 371);

b. The Government's motion in limine for a determination that exhibits are business records under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) and that summaries of business records are admissible pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 (ECF No. 307);

c. The Government's motion in limine to preclude assertion of a public authority defense or an entrapment by estoppel defense (ECF No. 381);

d. Defendant's motion to compel discovery (ECF No. 369); and

e. Defendant's motion to dismiss Counts 2-14 of the Indictment as violative of due process rights under the void for vagueness doctrine, or in the alternative a motion in limine to properly define the hospice regulation to the jury (ECF No. 380).

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.