Filed: Jan. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES KNOLL GARDNER , District Judge . NOW, this 8 th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants, Lieutenant Conrad Lamont, Todd Buskirk, Arnold Matos, John Stoffa, and the County of Northampton, which motion was filed June 29, 2015 (Document 24), toge-ther with; (A) Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Lieutenant Conrad Lamont, Todd Buskirk, Arnold Matos, John Stoffa,
Summary: ORDER JAMES KNOLL GARDNER , District Judge . NOW, this 8 th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of the following documents: (1) Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants, Lieutenant Conrad Lamont, Todd Buskirk, Arnold Matos, John Stoffa, and the County of Northampton, which motion was filed June 29, 2015 (Document 24), toge-ther with; (A) Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Lieutenant Conrad Lamont, Todd Buskirk, Arnold Matos, John Stoffa, ..
More
ORDER
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge.
NOW, this 8th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of the following documents:
(1) Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants, Lieutenant Conrad Lamont, Todd Buskirk, Arnold Matos, John Stoffa, and the County of Northampton, which motion was filed June 29, 2015 (Document 24), toge-ther with;
(A) Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Lieutenant Conrad Lamont, Todd Buskirk, Arnold Matos, John Stoffa, and the County of Northampton, together with;
(B) Statement of Material Undisputed Facts in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 25);
(2) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, which memorandum was filed July 27, 2015 (Document 29), together with;
(A) Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Statement of Purportedly Undisputed Facts in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 28);
(3) Defendants' Reply Brief in Further Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment, which reply brief was filed August 12, 2015 (Document 32); and
4) Plaintiff's Sur-Reply in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, which surreply was filed September 15, 2015 (Document 40);
upon consideration of the pleadings, exhibits, depositions and record papers; and for the reasons articulated in the accompanying Opinion,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants, Lieutenant Conrad Lamont, Tcidd Buskirk, Arnold Matos, John Stoffa, and the County of Northampton is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Todd Buskirk, Arnold Matos, John Stoffa, and the County of Northampton and against plaintiff Jeffrey Butler.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants "John/Jane Doe Guards #1-X" and "John/Jane Doe Supervisors #1-X" are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
