Filed: Jan. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER LYNNE A. SITARSKI , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Relator's Letter Motion to Renew Her Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Abbott's Answers and Objections to Relator's First Set of Requests for Admissions, as to Requests for Admission Nos. 31, 37-40, 58-60, and 66-68 (ECF No. 138, see ECF No. 102); and Defendant's response in opposition ( see ECF Nos. 104, 138); and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed thi
Summary: ORDER LYNNE A. SITARSKI , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Relator's Letter Motion to Renew Her Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Abbott's Answers and Objections to Relator's First Set of Requests for Admissions, as to Requests for Admission Nos. 31, 37-40, 58-60, and 66-68 (ECF No. 138, see ECF No. 102); and Defendant's response in opposition ( see ECF Nos. 104, 138); and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed this..
More
ORDER
LYNNE A. SITARSKI, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Relator's Letter Motion to Renew Her Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Abbott's Answers and Objections to Relator's First Set of Requests for Admissions, as to Requests for Admission Nos. 31, 37-40, 58-60, and 66-68 (ECF No. 138, see ECF No. 102); and Defendant's response in opposition (see ECF Nos. 104, 138); and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Relator's Letter Motion to Renew Her Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Abbott's Answers and Objections to Relator's First Set of Requests for Admissions, as to Requests for Admission Nos. 31, 37-40, 58-60, 66-68 (Doc. No. 138) is DENIED.
