RICE v. GRIMM BROTHERS REALTY COMPANY, 15-1405. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160126g86
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW , this __21 st ___ day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Seth Daniels, Esquire's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. 5), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED insofar as the Complaint alleges violations of 15 U.S.C. 1692e(2)(A) and 1692f(1) and the accompanying Pennsylvania Fair Credit Exte
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW , this __21 st ___ day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Seth Daniels, Esquire's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. 5), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED insofar as the Complaint alleges violations of 15 U.S.C. 1692e(2)(A) and 1692f(1) and the accompanying Pennsylvania Fair Credit Exten..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this __21st___ day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Seth Daniels, Esquire's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. 5), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED insofar as the Complaint alleges violations of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e(2)(A) and 1692f(1) and the accompanying Pennsylvania Fair Credit Extension Uniformity Act provisions.
2. Defendant's Motion is DENIED insofar as the Complaint alleges violations of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e(10) and 1692g and the accompanying Pennsylvania Fair Credit Extension Uniformity Act provisions.
Source: Leagle
