Harris v. Steadman, 12-993. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160216c06
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of February 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [Doc. No. 59] and Defendant's response in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Amended Com
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of February 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [Doc. No. 59] and Defendant's response in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Amended Comp..
More
ORDER
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of February 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [Doc. No. 59] and Defendant's response in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint within 14 days.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
