U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 11-223-1 (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160314b77
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Mr. Williams's pro se motion to vacate/set aside/correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. No. 648), the Government's Response in Opposition to Mr. Williams's motion (Doc. No. 656), and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Williams's motion vacate his sentence under 2255 (Doc. No. 648) is DENIED; 2. An evidentiary h
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Mr. Williams's pro se motion to vacate/set aside/correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. No. 648), the Government's Response in Opposition to Mr. Williams's motion (Doc. No. 656), and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Williams's motion vacate his sentence under 2255 (Doc. No. 648) is DENIED; 2. An evidentiary he..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Mr. Williams's pro se motion to vacate/set aside/correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 648), the Government's Response in Opposition to Mr. Williams's motion (Doc. No. 656), and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Mr. Williams's motion vacate his sentence under § 2255 (Doc. No. 648) is DENIED;
2. An evidentiary hearing on the motion is not warranted;
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle
