Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 14-7265. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20160315962 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER NITZA I. QUI ONES ALEJANDRO , District Judge . AND NOW, this 7 th day of March 2016, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' amended complaint filed by Defendant Google Venture, LLC, [ECF 68], Plaintiffs' opposition thereto, [ECF 72], Defendant's reply, [ECF 75], and the allegations contained in Plaintiffs' amended complaint, [ECF 67], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED a
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of March 2016, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' amended complaint filed by Defendant Google Venture, LLC, [ECF 68], Plaintiffs' opposition thereto, [ECF 72], Defendant's reply, [ECF 75], and the allegations contained in Plaintiffs' amended complaint, [ECF 67], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and all claims asserted against Google are dismissed.1

FootNotes


1. By separate Order issued this day, this Court has addressed the motion to dismiss filed by the other defendants to this action. The reasons for the Court's adjudication of both motions are set forth in a single Memorandum Opinion.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer