Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marshall v. Astrue, 12-6580. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20160329d42 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER JUAN R. S NCHEZ , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff Dianne Marshall's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, the Commissioner of Social Security's response thereto, and Marshall's reply, after careful and independent review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, Marshall's objections thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is OR
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff Dianne Marshall's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, the Commissioner of Social Security's response thereto, and Marshall's reply, after careful and independent review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, Marshall's objections thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:

1. This case shall be REMOVED from SUSPENSE; 2. Marshall's objections (Document 16) are OVERRULED; 3. The Report and Recommendation (Document 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 4. Marshall's Request for Review (Document 8) is DENIED; 5. Judgment is entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security; and 6. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer