Taha v. Bucks County Pennsylvania, 12-6867. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160329d43
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants the County of Bucks and the Bucks County Correctional Facility Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 105), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 114), and Defendants' Reply in Support thereof (ECF No. 117); Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 123) and Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 128); a transcript of oral argument held
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW , this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants the County of Bucks and the Bucks County Correctional Facility Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 105), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 114), and Defendants' Reply in Support thereof (ECF No. 117); Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 123) and Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 128); a transcript of oral argument held A..
More
ORDER
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants the County of Bucks and the Bucks County Correctional Facility Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 105), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 114), and Defendants' Reply in Support thereof (ECF No. 117); Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 123) and Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 128); a transcript of oral argument held April 24, 2015 (ECF No. 137); and supplemental briefing submitted by both parties (ECF Nos. 124, 125, 131, 133, 134, 136), it is HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. With respect to the sole issue presented by Plaintiff, the Court finds that Plaintiff's criminal history record information was wrongfully disseminated to the public in violation of the provisions of Pennsylvania's Criminal History Record Information Act; and
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
