ORDER

JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19), and all exhibits thereto, as well as Plaintiff's "Motion for Curative Amendment in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss" (Docket No. 20), "Motion to Supplement Add and Correct Plaintiff's Amended Complaint" (Docket No. 21), "Plaintiff's Supplement to Amended Complaint" (Docket No. 22), and "Motion for Permission to Add or Amend" (Docket No. 23), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's "Motion for Curative Amendment in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss" (Docket No. 20) is GRANTED only to the extent it seeks to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and supplement Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with the exhibits attached thereto;

2. Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 10) is DENIED;

3. Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement Add and Correct Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docket No. 21) is GRANTED only to the extent it seeks to amend the amended complaint to include additional information and exhibits;

4. Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Add or Amend (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED only to the extent it seeks to amend the amended complaint to include additional information and exhibits;

5. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 24) is DENIED;

6. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19) is GRANTED;

7. Plaintiff's due process claims are DISMISSED with prejudice;

8. Plaintiff's retaliation claim is DISMISSED without prejudice;

9. The Amended Complaint is DISMISSED; and

10. The Clerk of Courts shall close this matter.