HABERLE v. TROXELL, 5:15-cv-02804. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160401734
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. LEESON, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW, this 29 th day of March, 2016, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, ECF No. 18, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. 1 FootNotes 1. Plaintiff has not requested leave to amend, nor suggested the existence of any allegations not contained in the Amended Complaint. While leave to amend must be afforded e
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. LEESON, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW, this 29 th day of March, 2016, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, ECF No. 18, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. 1 FootNotes 1. Plaintiff has not requested leave to amend, nor suggested the existence of any allegations not contained in the Amended Complaint. While leave to amend must be afforded ev..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. LEESON, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, ECF No. 18, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.1
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff has not requested leave to amend, nor suggested the existence of any allegations not contained in the Amended Complaint. While leave to amend must be afforded even when not requested, see Phillips v. Cty. of Allegheny, 515 F.3d 224, 245 (3d Cir. 2008), that is not the case when amendment would be futile. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, the deficiencies in Plaintiff's claims could not be cured by amendment.
Source: Leagle
