WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 04-05396. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160408p71
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 211, 213), Harold C. Wilson's ("Wilson") Responses (ECF Nos. 218, 224) and Defendants' Replies (ECF Nos. 230, 234), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The City of Philadelphia's ("the City") motion is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor the City and against Wilson on: (1) Wilson's Brady claims against all former police officers; (2)
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 211, 213), Harold C. Wilson's ("Wilson") Responses (ECF Nos. 218, 224) and Defendants' Replies (ECF Nos. 230, 234), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The City of Philadelphia's ("the City") motion is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor the City and against Wilson on: (1) Wilson's Brady claims against all former police officers; (2) W..
More
ORDER
GERALD J. PAPPERT, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 211, 213), Harold C. Wilson's ("Wilson") Responses (ECF Nos. 218, 224) and Defendants' Replies (ECF Nos. 230, 234), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The City of Philadelphia's ("the City") motion is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor the City and against Wilson on: (1) Wilson's Brady claims against all former police officers; (2) Wilson's Monell claim against the City; (3) Wilson's federal and state law malicious prosecution claims against all former police officers; and (4) Wilson's intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against all former police officers.
2. The Philadelphia District Attorney's Office's ("DAO") motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks judgment on the part of Wilson's Monell claim alleging a "custom" of discrimination in jury selection.
Source: Leagle
