GARNER v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, 15-4879. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160421c67
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18 th day of April, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 1 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice as to petitioner's unexhausted claim and
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18 th day of April, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 1 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice as to petitioner's unexhausted claim and D..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED.1
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice as to petitioner's unexhausted claim and DISMISSED with prejudice as to petitioner's non-cognizable claims.
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
FootNotes
1. I note that the petitioner did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Source: Leagle
