BENDE v. PEACOCK MARITIME SA, 15-6301. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160422f66
Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 21 st day of April 2016, upon consideration of Defendants Peacock Maritime SA and Sojitz Marine & Engineering Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 43), Plaintiffs' Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 47), and for the reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 43) is DENIED. Defendants shall answer the Amended Complaint no later than May 5, 2016.
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of April 2016, upon consideration of Defendants Peacock Maritime SA and Sojitz Marine & Engineering Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 43), Plaintiffs' Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 47), and for the reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 43) is DENIED. Defendants shall answer the Amended Complaint no later than May 5, 2016.
Source: Leagle
