JACOBS v. CONTRACT CALLERS, INC., 15-05286. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160429e83
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Contract Callers, Inc.'s ("CCI") Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively to Strike (ECF No. 6), Suncere Jacobs's ("Jacobs") Response (ECF No. 14) and CCI's Reply (ECF No. 15), it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. Counts I and III, insofar as they allege "pattern or practice" and race discrimination claims
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Contract Callers, Inc.'s ("CCI") Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively to Strike (ECF No. 6), Suncere Jacobs's ("Jacobs") Response (ECF No. 14) and CCI's Reply (ECF No. 15), it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. Counts I and III, insofar as they allege "pattern or practice" and race discrimination claims ..
More
ORDER
GERALD J. PAPPERT, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Contract Callers, Inc.'s ("CCI") Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively to Strike (ECF No. 6), Suncere Jacobs's ("Jacobs") Response (ECF No. 14) and CCI's Reply (ECF No. 15), it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED.
Counts I and III, insofar as they allege "pattern or practice" and race discrimination claims under Title VII and the PHRA, are DISMISSED. Count II, insofar as it alleges a sex discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. Section 1981, is also DISMISSED. CCI's motion to dismiss the remainder of Counts I, II and III is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
