Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Romero v. Allstate Insurance Company, 01-3894 (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20160505d26 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 05, 2016
Latest Update: May 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 3 rd day of May 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to amend the Court's January 28, 2016 Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and the February 10, 2016 Amended Judgment Order (ECF Doc. No. 818), Defendants' Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 822), Plaintiffs' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 824) and for reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 818) is DENIED as to the January 28, 2016 Findi
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion to amend the Court's January 28, 2016 Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and the February 10, 2016 Amended Judgment Order (ECF Doc. No. 818), Defendants' Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 822), Plaintiffs' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 824) and for reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 818) is DENIED as to the January 28, 2016 Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and GRANTED as to the February 10, 2016 Amended Judgment Order.

We AMEND the Amended Judgment Order (ECF Doc. No. 817) to confirm counsels' agreement on the effect of the jury verdict on whether the Plaintiffs knowingly or voluntarily signed the Release: "JUDGMENT IS ENTERED on the jury verdicts in favor of Plaintiffs Boyd, Crease, Harper, Kearney, Kelly, Lawson, Peterson, and Reinerio and the Release is unenforceable as to all of their federal and state claims.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer