Jamison v. Colvin, 15-1006. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160520d84
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 18th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 9), the defendant's response (Document No. 10), the plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 14), and after a thorough and independent review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Document No. 13), it is ORDERED as follows:
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 18th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 9), the defendant's response (Document No. 10), the plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 14), and after a thorough and independent review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Document No. 13), it is ORDERED as follows: 1..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge.
NOW, this 18th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 9), the defendant's response (Document No. 10), the plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 14), and after a thorough and independent review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Document No. 13), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED1;
3. The plaintiff's Request for Review is DENIED.
FootNotes
1. Magistrate Judge Rice thoroughly reviewed and analyzed the record. His report is well-reasoned. There is no need to supplement it.
Source: Leagle
